Who Will Be The Next Tory / Labour / Lib Dem Party Leader
Politics to many is often a dour and dreary subject at the best of times, with very little motivation to read about it let alone bet on it. This is evident when you look at the betting markets for most politics, which are often poor value and buried at the bottom of a specials list.
There are two major exceptions to this, however, general elections and party leadership contests. This is when the drama ignites, the rumours begin and betting becomes competitive. These are the times where headline markets, offers and enhanced odds are available that can make backing the next leader or prime minister more favourable than usual.
In fast moving markets like these, based largely on opinion and hearsay, betting companies find it more difficult to price markets. This is why you saw the rug pulled from under the betting companies in recent national and leadership elections. In markets like these the flow of information can sometimes favour the punter, if you think you know something the bookies haven’t factored in you can often get good prices.
On this page we cover promotions and features for betting on the next party leaders and/or prime minister of the UK. By utilising these you could potentially add further value to a leadership bet. Leaders of different parties are elected by differing processes, you can read a guide to this further down this page.
Party Leadership Contest Betting Offers
This event has not started yet, please check back nearer the time. For other offers see our main loyalty page.
Political Leadership Contest Guide
There’s a temptation in the United Kingdom to feel as though we’re in charge of our own political destiny thanks to the elections that are held on a regular basis. Since 1911 that has been every five years, though the introduction of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act allows a General Election to be called earlier if a vote of no confidence in the government is issued or a vote of two-thirds of the House of Commons calling for said election happens.
Yet all a General Election allows the people of the United Kingdom to do is to choose which party will be in government, not who the leader of those parties will be. It’s entirely possible for someone to hate the leader of the Labour Party, for example, but vote to elect them to government regardless. Likewise, somebody could be a big fan of the leader of the Conservatives as a person but not be a fan of the party that they lead and therefore refuse to vote for them. How, then, do leadership elections of the major parties work?
Conservative Party Leader Selection Process
Let’s start by looking at the Tories, who changed their method of electing a leader back in 1998. In the years before 1965 a so-called ‘Magic Circle’ of Conservative MPs would select the candidates to be put forward for the leadership vote. That changed in ’65 to introduce a ballot of MPs, but then in 1997 a document called The Fresh Future outlined how things should change in that regard.
It noted that the Conservative Party membership had grown significantly and that these new party members should be given a say in who the leader of their party should be.
Triggering A Leadership Election
The actual leadership contest itself can be triggered via one of two means:
- The current leader decides to resign
- 15% of Conservative MPs inform the Chairman of the 1922 Committee that they don’t have confidence in the leader any more
The 1922 Committee is more correctly known as the Conservative Private Members’ Committee and was, interestingly enough, formed in 1923.
It is made up of backbench MPs and meets weekly when parliament is in session in order to give the backbenchers a chance to discuss how the Party is going independently from the frontbenchers.
There are 18 members of the Executive Committee that are responsible for overseeing the election of new Party leaders.
How The System Works
Current and Former Conservative Party Leaders | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Nationality | Leader | Selection | Served As PM? |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Kemi Badenoch | English | 2024- | Elected | No |
Rishi Sunak | English | 2022-2024 | Opponents Withdrew | Yes |
Liz Truss | English | 2022 (45 days) | Elected | Yes |
Boris Johnson | English | 2019-2022 | Elected | Yes |
Theresa May | English | 2016-2019 | Opponents Withdrew | Yes |
David Cameron | English | 2005-2016 | Elected | Yes |
Michael Howard | Welsh | 2003-2005 | Unopposed | No |
Iain Duncan Smith | Scottish | 2001-2003 | Elected | No |
William Hague | English | 1997-2001 | Elected | No |
Table shows leaders since 2000 and does not include acting leaders
The system introduced in 1998 saw a two-stage process become the norm. In the first stage, those interested in becoming the party leader put themselves forward to be nominated for the role, which requires the support of two Conservative MPs. The numerous choices are then presented to Conservative Members of Parliament who vote in order to decide upon a shortlist of two that will be put forward to the Party members.
The Members of the Conservative Party then vote on a ‘one member, one vote’ basis to decide who will become the new Party leader. The broad basis of these rules are set out in the Conservative Party Constitution, but that doesn’t explain the specifics. Instead, the Executive of the 1922 Committee in consultation with the Conservative Party Board will decide upon the exact rules and procedure that needs to be followed.
The initial voting by the MPs to decide upon the two candidates to be put forward to Party Members is done according to a first-past-the-post system. Each time there is a vote, the candidate with the fewest votes against their name is eliminated and voting continues until only two names remain.
Thatcher Ousted
It’s handy to take a look at a specific example of how the Tory Party’s system has worked over the years, looking at the manner in which Margaret Thatcher was removed from power.
Thatcher is one of the most controversial Prime Ministers ever to sit in office, adored by the right and despised by the left of the political divide. Towards the end of her time as leader of the Conservative Party and therefore Prime Minister, there was growing discontent about her leadership within her own party. This was mainly due to her approach towards the European Economic Community, which would later become the European Union.
She also suffered from a change in financial fortunes, having overseen an economic boom by the time of her third election but seeing the interest rates raised to 15% not long after being re-elected. She was challenged for her leadership position in December of 1989 by a little known backbencher called Sir Anthony Meyer. The challenge wasn’t seen as serious, but when 60 members of her own Party refused to support her her leadership began to feel undermined.
The popularity of both Thatcher and the Conservatives waned during the early part of 1990 and in November of that year Sir Geoffrey Howe resigned as the deputy leader, with Michael Heseltine announcing his intention to challenge her for the leadership the morning after Howe’s resignation speech. Despite leading the ballot after the first round of votes, Thatcher was persuaded to withdraw from the leadership election before the second round, at which point John Major and Douglas Hurd joined Heseltine on the ballot, with the former eventually winning.
Johnson Ousted
It is also useful to look at how Boris Johnson’s reign as PM ended when he was also ousted by his cabinet but under very different circumstances.
Johnson was elected by party members in 2019 following Theresa May’s (forced) resignation and then went on to achieve a huge majority victory over Jeremy Corbyn when he called a general election months later. Life started well for Johnson who won the election under the ticket of ‘getting Brexit done’, which many would say he did do. His other major pledge of ‘levelling up’ that won him so many Northern seats was less of a success and if anything a complete failure.
It wasn’t anything to do with policy in the end though that caused BJ’s demise. A series of mistakes that began with the handling of the pandemic showed Johnson to be flippant at best and an outright liar at worst. In particular the leaks that revealed MP’s were having sanctioned parties during corona virus lockdowns irked opposition parties, many of the Tory party and the public at large.
In the end similar to Thatcher, Johnson couldn’t see the writing on the wall and refused to leave. This resulted in a cabinet exodus that was lad in particular by Johnson’s chancellor Richi Sunak. The revolt worked and Johnson resigned, however, in the leadership election that resulted those that stayed loyal to Johnson seemed to have better favour with the conservative membership.
Ultimately, although the next leader in this situation becomes PM it is the least democratic of selection processes given the winner is picked by just 160,000 Tory party members. Despite it being obvious that the public at large favoured ex-chancellor Richi Sunak it was the more right wing Liz Truss that was selected on a tax cut ticket during a cost of living and energy crisis.
Truss immediately pulled the party to the right and cut a host of taxes during a cost of living crisis that ultimately had the opposite effect of what she was hoping for, destabilising the economy, junking the pound and increasing interest rates. Despite a series of U-turns and sacking her chancellor, Liz lost all faith and resigned after just 45 days.
Richi Sunak, who was rejected by the membership in the previous run-off vote with Truss, was elected new leader and installed as PM in less than a week. He was the third in just 3 months but ultimately the PM that the MP’s wanted and on that basis it seems likely he will remain much longer than his predecessor.
It is seems there is not a lot of point being a Conservative party member as at best you get to pick between two pre-selected candidates and if you pick the wrong one they just get ousted anyway. It demonstrates that the people who pick party leaders, in particular in the conservative party, are voting for the leader that will be best for them not necessarily the county. It is perhaps what is so very broken about how we elect our leaders.
Labour Party Leader Selection Process
Between 1980 and 2014, the Labour Party used an electoral college system to elect its leader. A this of the votes were issued to MPs and MEPs of the Labour Party, whilst another third were issued to individual members of the Party and the final third were issued to individual members of affiliate organisations such as trade unions.
Triggering A Leadership Election
If an MP believes that the current Labour leader isn’t doing a good enough job then they’ll need to find the support of 20% of the Labour Party’s MPs and MEPs in order to trigger a leadership election. At that point they would then write to the General Secretary in order to inform them that they intend to run for Party leader.
When this happened to Jeremy Corbyn in 2016 the big question that then came up was regarding whether or not the sitting Labour leader would automatically be on the ballot when challenged.
There was initially some debate about whether they would also need to receive the same number of votes as a challenger to be on the ballot. The decision was made that he would be, meaning that the same Members that elected him in the first place were also able to keep him in power.
How The Current System Works
Current and Former Labour Party Leaders | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Nationality | Leader | Selection | Served As PM? |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Keir Starmer | English | 2020- | Elected | Yes |
Jeremy Corbyn | English | 2015-2020 | Elected | No |
Ed Miliband | English | 2010-2015 | Elected | No |
Gordon Brown | Scottish | 2007-2010 | Unopposed | Yes |
Tony Blair | Scottish | 1994-2007 | Elected | Yes |
Table shows leaders since 2000 and does not include acting leaders
That system changed in 2015, at which point an MP needed the support of 10% of Labour Members of Parliament in order to get on the ballot of the leadership election. Once the candidates have emerged, their names are put forward to the members and affiliate members of the Party who vote in a ‘one member, one vote’ system.
The crucial thing about the Labour Party leadership elections is that MP and MEPs votes aren’t counted separately or given any extra weight, they’re just as valid as any other Party Member’s vote.
The number of votes needed for someone to make it onto the ballot differs depending on whether there is a vacancy because the previous leader has resigned or because they are being challenged. Everything is made clear as part of Chapter 4, Clause II of the Labour Party Rule Book 2016.
Liberal Democrat Leader Selection Process
Since the Liberals and the Social Democratic Party joined forces in 1988, the Lib Dems have used a system similar to Labour’s current one in order to decide upon who should be the Party leader.
How The Current System Works
Current and Former Lib Dem Party Leaders | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Nationality | Leader | Selection | Served As PM? |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Ed Davey | English | 2020- | Elected | No |
Jo Swinson | Scottish | 2019-2019 | Elected | No |
Sir Vince Cable | English | 2017-2019 | Unopposed | No |
Tim Farron | English | 2015-2017 | Elected | No |
Nick Clegg | English | 2007-2015 | Elected | No (Deputy PM) |
Menzies Campbell | Scottish | 2006-2007 | Elected | No |
Charles Kennedy | Scottish | 1999-2006 | Elected | No |
Table shows leaders since 2000 and does not include acting leaders
Candidates for the leadership of the Liberal Democrats must be MPs and they must be proposed by 10% of Lib Dem MPs, not including themselves. On top of that they also need to receive the support of at least 200 individual members of the Party from 20 constituencies or more.
At that point, the candidates that have received the relevant nominations will be put forward to a ballot of the Party members. This process can last up to two months and follows a one-member-one vote scheme. MPs are members of the Party so they’re allowed to vote, but their vote doesn’t count for any more than a normal Party member.
The election system asks members to declare their preference for leader as well as who they would like 2nd, 3rd and so on. The candidate needs to get 50% of the votes plus 1 vote in order to become leader, with lower preferences counting if necessary.